[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article-llm-ranking-april-2026-claude-gpt-gemini-20260409":3,"related-llm-ranking-april-2026-claude-gpt-gemini-20260409":36},{"id":4,"title":5,"slug":6,"summary":7,"cover_image":8,"category":9,"tags":10,"is_featured":19,"view_count":20,"status":21,"created_at":22,"updated_at":23,"target_keyword":24,"topic_slug":8,"series_slug":8,"excerpt":8,"review_status":25,"published_at":8,"content":26,"source_url":8,"seo_title":27,"seo_description":28,"keyword_intent":29,"reading_time":8,"scheduled_at":8,"canonical_url":8,"content_source_type":30,"generation_model":31,"generation_version":8,"prompt_version":8,"review_note":8,"quality_score":8,"fact_check_status":8,"source_urls":32,"primary_capability_id":8,"related_capability_ids":34,"cta_click_count":35},"56f1e3c5-1a06-4d28-b7f9-b0e8c9b13f73","2026年4月大模型排行榜：Claude Opus 4.6、GPT-5.4、Gemini 3.1 Pro 谁更强？","llm-ranking-april-2026-claude-gpt-gemini-20260409","2026年4月最新大模型实力排行榜，覆盖Claude Opus 4.6、GPT-5.4、Gemini 3.1 Pro、DeepSeek V4、Kimi K2.5等10余款主流模型，从编程、推理、多模态、性价比四大维度进行横向对比，并给出不同场景下的选型建议。",null,"review",[11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18],"大模型排行","Claude Opus 4.6","GPT-5.4","Gemini 3.1 Pro","DeepSeek V4","Kimi K2.5","模型对比","API定价",false,1176,"published","2026-04-09T01:57:31","2026-05-06T14:33:06","2026大模型排行榜","draft","## 2026 年 4 月大模型实力排行\n\n大模型市场在 2026 年迎来了新一轮混战。Anthropic、OpenAI、Google 三强鼎立，中国厂商 DeepSeek、月之暗面 Kimi、智谱 GLM 也在特定领域实现反超。本文基于最新基准测试数据，为你梳理当前大模型格局。\n\n## 第一梯队：旗舰三巨头\n\n### Claude Opus 4.6 — 编程之王\n\nAnthropic 的旗舰模型在 SWE-Bench 编程基准测试中拿到 62% 的得分，断层领先同级选手。GPQA 推理得分 89%，支持 100 万 token 上下文窗口，特别适合复杂代码重构和大型代码库审查。\n\n- **输入价格**：$15 \u002F 1M token\n- **输出价格**：$75 \u002F 1M token\n- **多模态**：文本 + 图片\n- **最佳场景**：代码审查、架构重构、复杂推理\n\n### GPT-5.4 — 最均衡选手\n\nOpenAI 的最新主力模型综合能力出色，GDPval 综合基准 83%，GPQA 推理 87%。指令跟随准确度和格式化输出稳定性在业界首屈一指。\n\n- **输入价格**：$2.50 \u002F 1M token\n- **输出价格**：$15 \u002F 1M token\n- **多模态**：文本 + 图片 + 音频\n- **最佳场景**：通用对话、内容生成、格式化输出\n\n### Gemini 3.1 Pro — 性价比与长文本标杆\n\nGoogle 的旗舰模型在推理能力上拔得头筹，GPQA 达到 94.3%，ARC-AGI-2 得分 77.1%。独家支持 200 万 token 上下文窗口和四模态（文本+图片+音频+视频）。\n\n- **输入价格**：$2 \u002F 1M token\n- **输出价格**：$12 \u002F 1M token\n- **多模态**：文本 + 图片 + 音频 + 视频\n- **最佳场景**：视频分析、海量文档处理、多模态理解\n\n## 第二梯队：性价比之王\n\n### DeepSeek V4 — 中文理解霸主\n\n中文理解能力超越 GPT-5.4，数学逻辑表现突出，缓存命中后价格低至 $0.028\u002F1M token，是预算敏感项目的首选。适配华为昇腾芯片。\n\n### Kimi K2.5 — 编程黑马\n\nSWE-Bench 得分达到 65.6%，超越 GPT-5.4。万亿参数 MoE 架构，开源可部署，输入价格仅 $1\u002F1M token。\n\n### GLM-5.1 — 被低估的全能选手\n\nSWE-Bench Verified 得分 77.8%，编程能力达到 Opus 的 94.6%。ChatBot Arena Elo 1451，价格仅 $0.50\u002F1M token，综合性价比极高。\n\n### MiniMax M2.7 — 速度之王\n\n响应速度全场最快，输入 $0.30\u002F1M token，适合高并发实时对话产品。\n\n## 第三梯队：轻量经济型\n\n| 模型 | 输入价格 | 推荐场景 |\n|------|---------|----------|\n| GPT-5.4 Nano | $0.20\u002F1M | 文本分类、简单摘要 |\n| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | $0.25\u002F1M | 长文档摘要 |\n| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | $3\u002F1M | 编程辅助 |\n\n## 选型速查表\n\n| 需求场景 | 首选模型 | 理由 |\n|---------|---------|------|\n| 编程开发 | Claude Opus 4.6 | SWE-Bench 断层第一 |\n| 多模态\u002F长文档 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | 200万上下文+视频 |\n| 中文\u002F低成本 | DeepSeek V4 | 中文之王+极低价格 |\n| 实时对话 | MiniMax M2.7 | 最快响应速度 |\n| 性价比编程 | Kimi K2.5 | SWE-Bench超GPT+开源 |\n\n## 趋势观察\n\n2026 年国产大模型在编程和中文理解上已不输甚至超越 GPT，差距主要体现在复杂英文创意写作和极端边缘场景的处理上。随着价格持续下探，选型的关键已从\"谁最强\"转向\"谁最适合我的具体场景\"。","2026年4月大模型排行榜：Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro 全面对比","2026年4月最新大模型排行榜，横向对比Claude Opus 4.6、GPT-5.4、Gemini 3.1 Pro、DeepSeek V4等10+模型的编程、推理、多模态能力与API价格，附选型指南。","compare","ai_assisted","claude-opus-4.6",[33],"https:\u002F\u002Fofox.ai\u002Fzh\u002Fblog\u002Fai-model-ranking-selection-guide-2026\u002F",[],0,{"items":37,"total":86,"page":87,"page_size":86,"pages":87},[38,56,60,73],{"id":39,"title":40,"slug":41,"summary":42,"cover_image":8,"category":9,"tags":43,"is_featured":19,"view_count":52,"status":21,"created_at":53,"updated_at":54,"target_keyword":55,"topic_slug":8,"series_slug":8,"excerpt":8,"review_status":25,"published_at":8},"3eca7344-9bf6-41cf-8bb2-0fa2486d9c89","AI 编程工具四月格局：Claude Code 称王，Codex 紧追，Google 掉队","ai-coding-tools-april-2026-claude-code-codex-20260409","2026年4月AI编程工具最新排名出炉。Claude Code凭借Opus 4.6模型蝉联第一，OpenAI Codex靠后台Agent功能紧追不舍，Cursor稳居IDE体验之王，而Google Antigravity更新缓慢令社区失望。本文详细解读四大梯队格局与选择建议。",[44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51],"AI编程工具","Claude Code","OpenAI Codex","Cursor","GitHub Copilot","编程Agent","IDE","开发者工具",577,"2026-04-09T02:02:30","2026-05-06T15:05:54","AI编程工具排名2026",{"id":4,"title":5,"slug":6,"summary":7,"cover_image":8,"category":9,"tags":57,"is_featured":19,"view_count":58,"status":21,"created_at":22,"updated_at":59,"target_keyword":24,"topic_slug":8,"series_slug":8,"excerpt":8,"review_status":25,"published_at":8},[11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18],1177,"2026-05-06T15:26:52",{"id":61,"title":62,"slug":63,"summary":64,"cover_image":8,"category":9,"tags":65,"is_featured":19,"view_count":69,"status":21,"created_at":70,"updated_at":71,"target_keyword":72,"topic_slug":8,"series_slug":8,"excerpt":8,"review_status":25,"published_at":8},"b566d2cb-09d9-4914-85bf-f62ce0a2231d","Cursor 3 Glass 深度评测：从 AI 编辑器进化为工作流自动化平台","cursor-3-glass-review-20260408","Cursor 3 代号 Glass 于 4 月 2 日发布，完成了从 AI 辅助编辑器到工作流自动化平台的架构级重构。新增 Agent Window、云端并行智能体、多代码库布局和可视化设计模式四大核心能力，与 Claude Code 和 OpenAI Codex 形成差异化竞争格局。",[66,47,45,67,68,50],"AI编程","编码助手","评测",274,"2026-04-08T06:29:30","2026-05-06T15:23:16","Cursor 3 评测",{"id":74,"title":75,"slug":76,"summary":77,"cover_image":8,"category":9,"tags":78,"is_featured":82,"view_count":83,"status":21,"created_at":84,"updated_at":85,"target_keyword":8,"topic_slug":8,"series_slug":8,"excerpt":8,"review_status":8,"published_at":8},"c2018cac-b683-4cf8-809c-63a47aa47650","2026年最佳AI编程助手对比：Cursor vs Copilot vs CodeBuddy","best-ai-coding-assistants-2026-comparison","深度对比当前最主流的AI编程助手——Cursor、GitHub Copilot和CodeBuddy，从代码补全、Agent模式、多模型支持、价格等维度帮你选择最适合的工具。",[66,47,79,80,81],"Copilot","CodeBuddy","代码助手",true,198,"2026-04-01T13:13:26","2026-05-06T15:08:18",4,1]